Review: The Rehearsal by Eleanor Catton

First off, I’ve been thinking about how a very positive or a very negative review affects my reading. Something that gets a negative review makes me cautious of reading it (for example some people on the Guardian complained a while back that Sea of Poppies was very difficult to read, so I let a copy of it on the library sale table float by me), even if later someone else reviews it positively (as Eva of A Striped Armchair has just done for Sea of Poppies, calling it an ‘India’s answer to Wilkie Collins’.) On the other hand, even positive reviews are not without a downside…. for me at least. I read a book someone else has glowingly recommended and I like it. But I don’t love it forever. Would I have liked it more if I’d found it on my own, without already thinking it of someone else’s book of the year is what I wonder. I feel a bit detached when I read on a recommendation, where an internal debate goes on inside: do I like it as much as they did? Why or why not? How do I say anything unique about it? Rather than simply engaging with the sheer pleasure of the book itself.

I thought these things as I read The Rehearsal by Eleanor Catton, but at the same time, I was sucked into the writing from the first page and read it in two days, which is unusually quick for me and contemporary fiction. Not only is the writing exceptionally imaginative and unique, but as someone who’s studied some acting, theatre history, playwrighting, etc I loved the life as performance metaphor she used throughout the book. The whole book has a very theatrical feel to it, scenes where you don’t know if they are being acted or if they are ‘real’, where stage directions and lighting cues are given in the middle of what had seemed a normal music lesson, where characters openly say what they think in something more like dramatic soliloquy than normal conversation. My coming to the theatre was the first time I felt a part of a true community, standing backstage watching the show, waiting for an entrance, whispering to friends, changing together in one large and messy dressing room… I’m no longer a part of that world, but I love books that recreate it for me (A.S. Byatt’s The Virgin in the Garden is one that combines history and theatre to beautiful effect).

But despite my pleasure in the theatre references, no finished performance is shown in the book (that was a disappointment, as I love to relive the dramatic thrill of performance through reading about it). It is all a rehearsal towards an unfinished play, towards life.

‘Mrs Bly,’ she says, “remember that these years of your daughter’s life are only the rehearsal for everything that comes after. Remember that it’s in her best interests for everything to go wrong. It’s in her best interests to slip up now, while she’s still safe in the Green Room with the shrouded furniture and the rows of faceless polystyrene heads and the cracked and dusty mirrors and the old papers scudding across the floor. Don’t wait until she’s out in the savage white light of the floods, where everyone can see.

The other fascinating way the theatrical metaphor is used in the book is to examine the way character and personality differ or stay the same as everyone else, emphasizing how the mothers of the teens can all be seen as interchangeable, as one actor playing all the parts, how girls in the first year of acting school, too young yet to play women, are all auditioning for the same “beautiful… glossy and svelte” role, while “the boys were here to audition for ten different character parts”. She shows how self definition is still in flux in the teen years and how everyone jostles so hard not only to fit in, but also to achieve a unique role within the group.

… each student was carefully carving out a place within the context of the group: those who variously wanted to be thought of as comic or tragic or eccentric or profound began to mark out their territory, fashioning little shorthand epithets for themselves and staking claim to a particular personality type so that none of the others would have a chance. … The other students all said, ‘Ester is so funny!’ and ‘Michael is so bad!’, and just like that each won the double security of becoming both a person and a type.

Stanley wasn’t sure what marked him out as a person. He hung back at the beginning of the year and let the other boys claim the roles of the leader and the player and the clown, watching with a kind of uncertain awe as they worked to recruit admirers and an audience. He guessed he wanted to be thought of as sensitive and thoughtful, but he didn’t pursue the branding actively enough and soon those positions were taken. He found himself thoroughly eclipsed by several of the more ambitiously moody boys, boys who were studied in the way they tossed their hair off their forehead, thin boys with paperback copies of Nietzsche nosing out of their satchels, boys wearing self-conscious forlorn looks, permanently anxious and always slightly underfed. Whenever these boys began to speak, the class would peel back respectfully to listen.

This notion of branding yourself, your personality, is seriously discussed by serious bloggers, anxious to capture the necessary audience. But even without that oh so capitalist terminology, as if we were all just a product and an advertisement for the product all in one (I’m sure I’ve read that somewhere recently, maybe this book?), this striving to find a unique role within the group is something I remember and as I said at the beginning, something I still wonder about. Will I rave about this book as others have done, I wondered, or assert my individuality by pointing out all its minor flaws that somehow let me down?

When a roommate of mine who was also in the same acting program as me introduced me to Jane Austen, she endlessly raved over Colin Firth (she also ended up taking a role and a boy that I’d wanted — there is a camaraderie in acting, but also a great deal of competition especially between similar types of people, all up for the same roles. The same goes for life in any group…) Not to be completely outdone and despite liking Pride and Prejudice just as much as every other old fashioned romantic idealist at heart, I focused my attention and admiration more strictly on Jane Austen herself and on the sarcastic humourous rational side of her, rather than the much raved over romantic bits. (I grew up with a sister I was closely and unfavourably compared to, hence my deep desire for some individuality in my interests, a semblance that I’m not like everyone else.)

Hence my questions. Would I have liked this book more if I’d found it first, if it was just me and the book in a private dialogue instead of me and the book and all its other fans? Maybe yes. But then I might have simply overlooked it and never known. All I can say is, it’s a amazing new way of writing that Eleanor Catton has developed, infusing prose with new life through the language of the theatre and it’s a fascinating character study of the way teachers interact with and attempt to influence students, the way girls feed off secrets… ahh, if any of this has at all peaked your interest or even curiosity, read it, it’s one of the best new books out there.

8 thoughts on “Review: The Rehearsal by Eleanor Catton

  1. Claire (The Captive Reader) says:

    I definitely feel your point about reading a book after reading someone else’s glowing review. I want to have a personal bond with the books I read but, when I come to them via someone else’s review, I feel like I’m invading someone else’s space and even if I adore the book it won’t be mine, my feelings for it will always be tied up with theirs and I’ll always feel some jealousness because of that. Let’s not even go into the strange competitiveness and terror I feel when writing a review of that same book…

    But I love your review (and apologize if my giddy review of this book was one of the ones causing you angst – I egotistically suspect it might have been). I love how you focus on the performance theme, picking out one of my favourite bits about how girls in the first year of acting school, too young yet to play women, are all auditioning for the same “beautiful… glossy and svelte” role, while “the boys were here to audition for ten different character parts”. And it was great to hear some personal details too and how that part of your life influences your reading! That’s what I love most about reading book blogs: the best reviews are the most personal ones, the ones where your readers learn something both about the book and the reviewer, a perspective they can’t get anywhere else.

    • Carolyn says:

      Ha, yes… your ego was correct! No problem though, I’m glad I read it. (I was at one point working on a novel myself with a theatre setting, so as I say, I’m always intrigued to read books with that background and especially ones that use it and write it so well!) I always worry I write too many personal details into this stuff, but I can’t help explaining my reactions to things, so it’s nice to know that it’s of interest.

  2. Dominique says:

    Hi :). This sounds like an interesting book. I don’t think I’ve heard of this one before actually, I’ll have to keep my eyes open for a copy. I’m so influenced by other people’s reviews too. If a blogger gives something a glowing review and it sounds like my thing I’ll rush out and get a copy. But then when I review it and link back to their review, I often feel bad like I might be disappointing them if I only thought it was alright or didn’t like it. I’ll still say whatever I think, but I’ll feel a bit guilty.

    • Carolyn says:

      Hi Dominique, thanks for coming by! I haven’t started to linking to other people’s reviews yet, is that commonly done? As I sort-of wrote in my post, I like to see my writing as individual and not compare it to others’ as much as possible! Maybe it doesn’t matter so much that we differ in opinion, but that we all enjoy talking about and sharing books. Healthy variety is good.

  3. Shannon says:

    I heartily agree with you re: other people’s reviews and its impact on our own reading experience. Many times, when I end up not liking it so much, I start to doubt myself and wonder if I’m just, well, stupid. Which is why I flouder around, trying to give voice to what my problem with the book really is (to prove to myself/reassure myself that I’m not stupid??)

    “Would I have liked it more if I’d found it on my own, without already thinking it of someone else’s book of the year is what I wonder.”

    This really struck a chord with me. Sometimes I do feel like someone else has a greater right to a book than I do, because they got there before me and have already blogged about it (and where I heard of said book). And sometimes I come across a negative/positive review and people are saying “I haven’t read any [positive or negative] reviews of this book and so I will/won’t read it” and I want to jump up and down and get their attention because they haven’t read my review and what they’re saying isn’t fair to the book! (Do we ever really grow out of some of our more infantile emotions?)

    All that aside, I thought this was a lovely review and very coherent and focused – on the acting metaphor etc., which helped remind me of the things I did like about it.

    • Carolyn says:

      Thanks Shannon. I certainly don’t think you’re stupid! But I suppose book blogging can seem a bit like high school sometimes, even though we all have our own place to have our own say (which is more than I had in high school!), I sometimes feel this pressure to conform to certain standards of behaviour, I find myself becoming defensive, worrying I’ll be judged for a different opinion than the ‘pack’. So it’s nice to know that I’m not alone in that. 🙂

  4. Nymeth says:

    I loved your thoughts on taste and individuality, on finding a unique place for yourself within a group (and the commercial language of those Serious Blogging Talks makes me uncomfortable too, no matter how much people say it isn’t really about money or capitalism), and on the effect that feeling that our response to a book is being mediated by someone else’s can have on our reading. I don’t necessarily feel that something I discovered through someone else is not my own, but I do feel that way sometimes with books with a huge cultural/literary impact. I feel that I have to respond to that impact in addition to the book itself. I actually mentioned that some time ago when I reviewed Mrs Dalloway – I said that it took me a long, long time to feel that I could be alone with Virginia Woolf, instead of always being surrounded by the Spectres of Cultural Relevance. So yes, I can definitely see what you mean, even if not in the exact same way.

    • Carolyn says:

      I think I haven’t written reviews on Mrs Dalloway or The Waves yet is because I felt so alone with them that I don’t quite know how much I want to write about the experience. But I see your point. It’s most often old book friends that I hear in my head when I approach the classics, sometimes choosing to disregard the books they liked if the friendship falls apart. Wankers, I say to myself, them and James Joyce and Philip Roth all! 😉 When maybe James and Philip didn’t deserve that, who knows… I’m glad I was able to come to Proust without hearing from anyone who’d read it, not friends or university profs or literary critics. I just saw a stack of various volumes of his in a used bookshop and started to get very curious, not even knowing which one was the first one to read! I took them out from the library several times, not getting far but still curious, before I found out people aspired to reading him without actually doing it, so decided it couldn’t be that hard to give it a serious go. (A bit of a competitive aspect there in the end!) Ahem. I’ve wandered off…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s